To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges |
From: | Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:24:25 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I used to use 'fifty-four' for the check, but had lots or requests for
repeats, so I also started using 'five four' for the check and had lots
less requests.
I think 54 and 64 sound a lot alike in the QRM. 73 Tom W7WHY On 11/24/2014 5:20 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote: I find six nine instead of sixty-nine much easier to accurately copy on SSB and best of all it is less syllables. John KK9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Friday November 28 - Ladder Format but with Dupes OK, Thomas Hutton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges, Gary Sutcliffe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges, john |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges, Gary Sutcliffe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |