CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
From: Jim Fielder <JFielder@TwinCityNetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:15:14 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Me too!   I think so2r is a huge advantage over so1r.   I bet we would see more 
newbies stay with contesting if they felt they had a fighting chance to win 
with their so1r setup.   They put in a FT effort only to find out someone has 
50%  more Qs than they have.  After all this is a competition so they should be 
in their own class.  Then when they are ready they too can invest in multiple 
towers with stacked beams and so2r.  If it is the goal to increase activity in 
contesting I feel we should not scare away those SO1R operators but rather 
recognize their efforts.

73, Jim
KE0L

> On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:20 PM, N2TK, Tony <tony.kaz@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> For my own selfish reasons I would like to see SO1R and SO2R Unassisted
> separate.
> 
> 73,
> N2TK, Tony
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed
> Sawyer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:19 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
> 
> Ditto the KD4D post.
> 
> 
> 
> Why don't we let the unassisted operators decide whether the concern of
> assisted ops invading our category is worth eliminating it over the concern?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No reason to merge the 2 categories and then do an overlay.  Just leave it
> the way it is and clarify reasonable questions like Braco's question.
> 
> 
> 
> By the way, do to great efforts of the organizations and contest managers,
> doesn't the ARRL and CQ contests represent something like 75%+ of all the
> contest Qs made in a year?  Why exactly should this majority follow the
> "rest of the world" minority?  Just sayin.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>