| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] who works the most NILS? |
| From: | kr2q@optimum.net |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Apr 2016 01:35:54 +0000 (GMT) |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Recently (here) someone speculated about what category has the higher rate of
NILs
Here is the answer (hope this lines up). These are the average rates per
category of entry.
CQWW CW 2015 (unassisted)
World Top 10
NIL CNIL
QRP 0.57% 0.43%
LP 0.78% 0.94%
HP 0.51% 0.72%
USA Top 10% per category
NIL CNIL
QRP 0.68% 0.46%
LP 0.60% 0.37%
HP 0.63% 0.63%
Europe Top 10% per category
NIL CNIL
QRP 0.83% 0.62%*
LP 0.62% 0.52%
HP 0.69% 0.73%
* = one outlier (15.68%) removed from data
As a reminder a NIL is call you claimed but nothing close appears in the other
guy's log.
A CNIL is NIL you caused in another log (He logged you, you didn't log him).
de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Additional Penalty, Ken K6MR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2016 MI QSO Party Activations workbook Rev 05 - FINAL, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Ontario QSO Party, Tom Haavisto |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2016 MI QSO Party Activations workbook Rev 05 - FINAL, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |