To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:25:58 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Fri,6/10/2016 3:54 PM, James Cain wrote: I'm happy to read in QST about new technology that I barely understand; I would be, if QST had anything worth reading. It almost never does, and I often find significant errors in what I read. QST is no longer a good reason for being an ARRL member. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service, James Cain |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Printed scores and spatial concepts, Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service, James Cain |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] sending DX QSLs from US other than via ARRL service, James Cain |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |