To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness |
From: | Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:54:18 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
WK6I writes: > Again, there is an example model of the changes being discussed: the > CQWW RTTY. Go look at the results. I do a lot of RTTY contesting. Moving the biggest CW and SSB DX contests towards the RTTY model of in-country-QSO's-count-for-points is not a good idea. Most RTTY contests have always allowed in-country QSO's to count for points to drum up the rates to a level to keep it interesting for the whole period. If RTTY becomes substantially more popular then maybe in CQWW RTTY they could put in-country Q's at zero points (I have heard at least one RTTY contest director wonder out loud if his contest is reaching this tipping point yet.) Tim N3QE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Jeff Clarke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] RES: CQWW Madness, Jeff Clarke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Kelly Taylor |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Ed Muns |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |