| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com, |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Audio and Video Proof - a different "contest" |
| From: | <kr2q@optimum.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:26:35 GMT |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
http://nyti.ms/2bZHdRY What do you think? Did he break the rules by running between "mults" instead of "training?" Looks like video proof (with a human witness) is good enough for Guinness! Hope you enjoyed this lighter look at "contesting." de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party, Timothy Holmes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 30-Minute SSB Contest Tonight, dfaklis@frontiernet.net |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party, Timothy Holmes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Audio and Video Proof - a different "contest", Ed Muns |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |