You can also call it ALTERNATE CQ :) or as Jose says 2BSIQ :)
73's Filipe Lopes
CT1ILT - CR6K
F4VPX - TM3M
2016-12-02 14:46 GMT+01:00 <kr2q@optimum.net>:
> OK, this is driving me nuts. The wrong terminology is being used here.
>
> They are NOT dual CQing. That would be a violation of the rules.
>
> DUAL CQing would mean they are CQing at the same time.
>
> Think about "DUAL citizenship"
> Think about "DUAL universes"
> Think about "DUAL responsibility"
> Think about "DUAL ownership"
>
> All of these signify "at the same time."
>
> The correct term for what OO and MJ (and NT and others) are doing is called
> DUELING CQs.
>
> First, rig 1 calls CQ (or test or dit-dit), THEN (not at the same time)
> rig 2 calls CQ.
>
> They go back and forth, as in a DUEL
>
> Think about Olympic fencing
> Parry then Riposte
>
> OK, no idea if anyone cares about this but me, but I feel better now.
>
> Thanks for the bandwidth.
>
> de Doug KR2Q
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|