It also seems that the contestant was asked for an audio recording the
previous year, under the same rule, and failed to provide it then.
With a year to think about it, he did the same again. The rule
provides for reclassification to checklog which seems fair to me in
the (apparent) circumstances.
Peter G4MJS
On 4 March 2017 at 00:17, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest
<cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> Not knowing the full details, however, it seems that the station has been
> DQ'd solely due to the lack of audio recording. That is, no other rule
> violation or suspected violation was mentioned. So if indeed the log checker
> did not have any other concerns and the lack of recording was the only
> reason, the DQ seems a bit excessive.
>
> Rudy N2WQ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|