CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Innovation

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs - killing Innovation
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:34:02 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
yep, happened to me many times...

73 Rich NN3W


On 3/18/2017 1:58 PM, Steve London wrote:
Actually, the Russian DX contest, currently running, does exactly that - If you work folks who do not send in a log, and those same stations do not work many others who send in logs, those QSO's are removed from your log with the note "not in contest" in the log checking report.

A good reason to not operate that contest, especially for those outside of Russia and Europe.

73,
Steve, N2IC

On 03/17/2017 04:07 PM, DXer wrote:
If you want to see how much activity would potentially change by
invalidating casual/non-participants QSOs, look at the number of unique
callsigns in logs versus submitted logs.

I don't have the numbers, but suspect it would be illuminating.

73 de Vince, VA3VF


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>