CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns – CQ WW SSB contest.

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns – CQ WW SSB contest.
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:45:26 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Has the April issue been sent out?

John KK9A


To:     DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest]        Disqualified callsigns – CQ WW SSB 
contest.
From:   Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:47:02 -0400


It's printed at the end of the results in the April issue of CQ.

73,

Paul, N8HM

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 6:52 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com> wrote:

> I saw this on another list. Nothing on the CQWW Blog. Now I see it here:
>
> http://dx-world.net/disqualified-callsigns-cq-ww-ssb-contest/
>
> I find the following line disturbing: 'Reports suggest....'
>
> Any reason it had to be made public this way? I don't fault
> the website, it was a scoop.
>
> We all want the CC to do its job, but why/how the info got out this way?
> Somehow I doubt all these people volunteered the info they were
> disqualified.
>
> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>