Oops, page 109 of the April CQ finishes the line scores and has the
checklog & DQ list. It is missing from the results posted on the Internet
at both www.cq-amateur-radio,com and CQWW.com, guess they use the same
file. I emailed Rich W2VU so that it will be corrected.
Dave K3ZJ
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
wrote:
> David,
>
>
> Thanks for the link. Interesting. (Hing Kong?)
>
>
> I have to wonder, is this all of it, or was this cut off after Page 15
> (magazine page 108)? I'm looking at the copy of the CQ WW site, not the
> magazine site.
>
>
> And if the listed of DQ'd calls is shown, I'm not seeing it at first
> glance. But I do have to get back to work, so maybe I'll spot it later
>
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
>
> On 04/12/17, David Siddall wrote:
>
> John,
>
> The results also were posted at the usual two websites, those of CQ
> Magazine and WWROF CQWW (cq-amateur-radio.com [CQ-Amateur-Radio.COM
> <http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/cq_contests/cq_ww_dx_contes
> t/index_cq_ww_dx_contest.html>]
> and
> cqww.com [CQWW SSB Scores
> <http://www.cqww.com/results/2016_cq_ww_dx_ssb_line_scores.pdf>]. I don't
> know about post delivery of the paper magazine, I get it electronically --
> it is identical to the paper and delivered wherever I happen to be in the
> world on the first of the month. The electronic version arrived as
> expected on April 1.
>
> 73, Dave K3ZJ
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:45 AM, john@kk9a.com <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>
> > Has the April issue been sent out?
> >
> > John KK9A
> >
> >
> > To: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns – CQ WW SSB
> > contest.
> > From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:47:02 -0400
> >
> >
> > It's printed at the end of the results in the April issue of CQ.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Paul, N8HM
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 6:52 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I saw this on another list. Nothing on the CQWW Blog. Now I see it
> here:
> > >
> > > http://dx-world.net/disqualified-callsigns-cq-ww-ssb-contest/
> > >
> > > I find the following line disturbing: 'Reports suggest....'
> > >
> > > Any reason it had to be made public this way? I don't fault
> > > the website, it was a scoop.
> > >
> > > We all want the CC to do its job, but why/how the info got out this
> way?
> > > Somehow I doubt all these people volunteered the info they were
> > > disqualified.
> > >
> > > 73 de Vince, VA3VF
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|