[CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?

[jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>]

Bart - the wording of the rule change for remote operations ("If another 
operator acts as the on-site control operator of the remote station you are 
using, the entry must be submitted in a multioperator category") implies that 
there is no such thing as a single-op remote entry.


How does the control-op issue compare to a physical guest op, where the station 
owner is still physically present during the contest? Should such guest 
operations be considered multi-op as well? If the issue is that the local 
control op *might* be required to take some action, the same is true of the 
station owner with a physically present guest op.


73 John K3TN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest