To: | CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? |
From: | jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | jpescatore@aol.com |
Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:24:48 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I received some clarification on the spirit and intent of the rule change around remote operation: If the station owner designates the remote operator as control op and the station owner does not perform any station related function during the contest (no fixing things, etc.) then the remote operation can be considered single op. If the station owner *does* do anything related to the station or antennas or other equipment used in the contest, then multi-op That makes sense to me - just as the same rule makes sense for a guest op physically at someone else's station. 73 John K3TN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Charles Harpole |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always, Ed Sawyer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Ria Jairam |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Kevin Stockton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |