To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ? |
From: | "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> |
Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:30:53 -0300 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I don't wish for my UNassisted score to be combined with others to choose to go assisted. Both are completely separate categories and should not be combined, regardless of what the final tally is. I could care less what someone got for a final score using the assisted category. It has zero bearing in comparison to what I do when I choose to go "UN". To combine them is to water down the results and usher in the demise of the CQWW's as we know it. Mike VE9AA Mike, Coreen & Corey Keswick Ridge, NB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, Ria Jairam |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, Stan Stockton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, Barry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, AA6DX - Mark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |