| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1 |
| From: | "Richard F. DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:39:31 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
This is a joke, right? Licensed hams use alternate callsigns all the
time in contests - especially WPX.
73 Rich NN3W On 2/14/2018 7:27 PM, Ed Sawyer wrote: Masa, Why don't you just get a W3 call sign and avoid this mess? You will never be competitive in ARRL DX having to explain who you are. I am sure that many DX stations would be very happy to work a W3 from DC.As to WPX, a 4U1 callsign is clearly an advantage in a Prefix contest. It does not seem fair to me that a 4U1 can compete equally with a W1 in the WPX contest.Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1, Dennis Moore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1, rjairam@gmail.com |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1, Dennis Moore |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |