CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Inaudible signals discussions

To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Inaudible signals discussions
From: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 11:49:50 +0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
pe 7. kesäk. 2019 klo 17.37 Dave Wright (k3dcw

> QSO credit for logging inaudible signals.
> I’ve been trying to stay out of this argument, but this statement right
> here is representative of the kind of rhetoric that leads to the
> anti-JT/FT-mode hysteria, and shows the misinformation about the way the
> FT/JT modes handle and report SNR. It isn’t Jim’s (K1TN) fault, but is
> likely simply due to a misunderstanding of the WSJT-X signal reporting
> system.
>
>
I have been at a station where we had parallel earphones.
Some operators were logging QSOs when the guy sitting next was hearing just
noise.

I have been logging QSOs when some others that came to the same frequency
heard just noise when I was hearing the far far away three pointers.

I was accused of running over power as I was hearing so well.
Were the guys right when they claimed I was breaking the power rule?


73,
Jukka OH6LI


PS. Food for thought:
One of these incidents happened when I was running low power and the guys
accusing me of hearing so well as I was running far more than a gallon and
a half.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>