| To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest |
| From: | Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:08:58 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I'm not sure how providing breakdowns changes the outcome. CW is quickly going to die in VHF contests since its either high rate SSB or not. And if not, FT4/8 wins the day. The same thing is happening to many DX pursuits. 6M and 160M are becoming dominated by FT8. Thankfully, I enjoy CW and SSB HF contests where that problem manages itself. And the new HF Digi contest provides a nice competitive outlet for those inclined. 73 Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest, Dennis McAlpine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest, Courtney Judd |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest, Stan Zawrotny |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest, Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |