To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST donovanf at starpower.net donovanf at starpower.net Mon Aug 26 14:23:14 EDT 2019 Previous message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Next message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The DX Contest results article in September QST (now available via the ARRL homepage) is just as awful. Someone at ARRL HQ needs to undertake a serious review of how contest results are reported in QST. IMHO contest results articles should not be directed at the committed contester audience, every one of us knows where to look for the on-line results. The articles should be written to attract the interest of the not-yet-committed. 73 Frank W3LPL |
From: | john@kk9a.com |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:36:35 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I agree, articles to attract new contesters would be great. Also it
is nice to show more than top ten scores, many little pistol ops would
love to see their callsign in the magazine. CQ Magazine still does this.
John KK9A Frank W3LPL wrote: The DX Contest results article in September QST (now available via the ARRL homepage) is just as awful. Someone at ARRL HQ needs to undertake a serious review of how contest results are reported in QST. IMHO contest results articles should not be directed at the committed contester audience, every one of us knows where to look for the on-line results. The articles should be written to attract the interest of the not-yet-committed. 73 Frank W3LPL _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|