CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:43:17 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 03/02/2020 19:57, N2RJ wrote:
ARRL declared this type of remote operation OK for DXCC some years ago -
you can operate from W6, work Macau, minami torishima, Philippines etc then
hop on a remote on the east coast and work Europe and Africa. Hop on a
southeast remote and work ZS, PY, LU, CE, CP etc. Owning a station is not
even necessary.

Is there anyone who does not accept that this neatly illustrates how just how ARRL got it wrong, and thereby devalued its premier awards program - DXCC?

73,
Paul EI5DI






_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>