Calling it “dueling CQs” like N1MM does it makes it instantly
understandable.
Ria
N2RJ
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:09 PM Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> In Jim’s defense... I can believe him. I didn’t know what the acronym
> stood for, either.
>
> And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> > On Mar 18, 2021, at 6:07 PM, OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk> wrote:
> >
> > @K9YC Jim
> > And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
> > just point something out !
> >
> > Categories and Assisted and SO2R and . . . .
> > Isn't it all about the way results are presented to the public ?
> > Why is it so hard to make OVERLAYs and put the results on-line?
> > I think it is all about sorting the final results.
> >
> > Take a look of the listings in the SAC Booklet 2020 -
> > https://www.sactest.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Booklet-2020.pdf
> >
> > -----------------------------------
> > * Vy 73 de OZ2I Henning *
> > -----------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Den tor. 18. mar. 2021 kl. 17.11 skrev Jim Brown <
> k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com
> >> :
> >
> >>> On 3/17/2021 2:06 PM, ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest wrote:
> >>> It seems the top scores in CW contesting from now on will be dominated
> >> by those ops capable of 2BSIQ.
> >>
> >> What is 2BSIQ?
> >>
> >> 73, Jim K9YC
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|