To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Amateurs of Canada Winter Contest - December 18, 2021 00:00 to 23:59 UTC |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:45:30 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 12/15/2021 6:24 AM, Michael Adams wrote: However, using a skimmer, even a private-not-connected-to-the-spotting-network skimmer, still makes you assisted. RAC rules consider SO(A) to be M/S. Well, it is like having a second operator to scan the band(s) for stations to work. And as they should, rules for some contests makes those using software (or firmware) to copy CW assisted. And the rules for many state QSO parties consider a driver for mobile operation a second operator. Both of these seem completely reasonable to me. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] OK DX RTTY Contest, Luděk Odehnal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Amateurs of Canada contest rules, Bart Ritchie (VE5CPU) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Amateurs of Canada Winter Contest - December 18, 2021 00:00 to 23:59 UTC, Michael Adams |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Amateurs of Canada contest rules, Bart Ritchie (VE5CPU) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |