CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest
From: dimitri cosson <dimitri.cosson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 22:18:43 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Jim,

<<<What DOES make a lot of 
sense is team contesting, with each signing their own call, ...>>>

That already exist, it's called the "club scores"...

73, Dimitri F4DSK 

⁣Transmited from my Morse Telegraph​

Le 1 févr. 2023 à 19:58, à 19:58, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> a 
écrit:
>On 1/31/2023 11:46 AM, Joe wrote:
>> But also do the sub category.
>> 
>> *4. Multi-Transmitter Distributed (MULTI-DISTRIBUTED):*
>
>It isn't clear from the Rules whether the stations all sign the same 
>call or different ones. All signing the same call is a terrible idea, 
>because it reduces the number of calls to work. What DOES make a lot of
>
>sense is team contesting, with each signing their own call, like NAQP 
>and NA Sprint. It's especially good when teams are formed from members 
>of the same club. It's not so good when top operators combine to form
>an 
>"all-star" team.
>
>73, Jim K9YC
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>