CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 09:41:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Actually, the impact is even less than John suggests - the article on the RBN web site is badly outdated - last year in CQWWCW the RBN posted well over 10  million spots in the 48 hours.  From the self-spotting station's standpoint, doing so would be much more impactful during SSB contests.

73, Pete N4ZR

On 3/1/2023 6:59 AM, K3TN via CQ-Contest wrote:
I'm not a fan of the self spotting decision for HF contests, but I don't think 
it approaches mayhem - more just another level of erosion of old norms.
The Reverse Beacon Network 
(https://www.reversebeacon.net/pages/Using+the+RBN+33) quotes an average rate 
of about 20 spots per second during a major CW contest, which works out to 
roughly 3.5M spots over a 48 hour contest.
There are 288 10 minute segments in a 48 hour contest. If 5,000 ops were 
self-spotting every 10 minutes for the entire 48 hours, it would only be about 
1M spots over the contest duration - and that is a very high estimate.
So, roughly a 30% increase in spotting volume is not going to be a big deal in 
a CW contest. In a phone contest, the spot volume is so low and the volume 
won't approach that of a CW contest.
73 John K3TN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>