Oops! Typo! I meant to say "Is it possible that most of the really
noisy ones are Class A...". My point was to ask if the reason Plasma
seems to be noisier is because:
a) The technology is just noisier
OR
b) The plasma manufacturers are skimping on quality more
OR
c) More plasma displays being sold are Class A than for other TV types
OR
d) Other
I haven't seen many (if any) non-plasma tv's that are Class A. Only since
starting to research plasma have I found such a large number of Class A
devices being marketed to home consumers. This trend is disturbing! Try
explaining to your neighbor that their brand new $10,000 TV is a Class A
device which is supposed to be used in a commercial/industrial environment!
"But I bought it at Best Buy or Circuit City or ...."
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:19:46 -0600, Don Allen wrote:
>
> N6KJ wrote:
>
> >There's been a fair amount of discussion on this mail reflector about RFI
> >from plasma TV's. One thing I've noticed in my research into Plasma TV's
> >is that quite a number of them (esp. the larger ones like 50") are actually
> >Class A (commercial/industrial use) instead of Class B (residential use)
> >devices. Is it possible that most of the really noisy ones are Class B
> >devices which are being sold to home users? Anybody know of a particular
> >model that is "quiet"? In particular, a 50" model that is "quiet"? Anybody
> >know anything about the 46" model being sold by Gateway?
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >RFI mailing list
> >RFI@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
> Kelly,
>
> Meeting FCC Class B limits is actually more stringent than meeting Class
> A. If a product meets Class B, it already meets and exceeds that of
> Class A.
>
> 73,
> Don W9CW
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|