RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] UPS interference/Recommendation Request

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] UPS interference/Recommendation Request
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:14:43 -0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I have belkin, apc, and tripp-lite here and they all seem fine.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rfi-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Alex
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 13:20
> To: rfi@contesting.com
> Subject: [RFI] UPS interference/Recommendation Request
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I purchased a Cyberpower BC1285C UPS yesterday and found immediately that
> it is generating TVI on the video carrier of broadcast channel 5, 77.25
> MHz, when just plugged in and while it's still off. The interference
> propagates through the power cord and I can suppress it for the most part
> with about 10 ferrite VHF snap on cores. I will set up a web page to
> document this interference problem and inform the Cyberpower company. A
> quick test on the ham bands (MF-UHF) did not reveal any interference there
> yet. I have to do more tests to be certain.
> 
> Here's a link to the UPS:
> 
> http://www.cyberpowersystems.com/BC1285C.asp
> 
> I have very little experience with UPSes in an Amateur Radio setting, so I
> wonder how typical this is and if there's a known good RFI/TVI free
> alternative. I need about 1000VA. Perhaps it's wiser to keep this UPS if
> the channel 5 interference is the only interference it generates?
> 
> 73,
> --Alex KR1ST
> http://www.kr1st.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>