Just curious ...
Are the Dunestar and W3NQN filters also 150W max.,
same as the ICE models?
> I have recently measured a couple of ICEs419 (6 band switched BPF) and a
> Dunestar600 (similar to the 419) with an accurrate Vector Network Analyzer.
>
> While frequency response is similar between both models on the lower bands,
> the Dunestar is significantly sharper and has a higher ultimate rejection
> (although not spectacular) on 20, 15 and 10m, at the expense of roughly 0,1
> to 0,2 dB additional insertion loss vs the 419.
>
> I chose the Dunestar for my application (SO2R-M/S).
>
> I also have a single-band 160m W3NQN BPF which outperforms both the ICE and
> the Dunestar in terms of insertion loss and selectivity
>
> I have the data if someone is interested.
>
> 73 Juan EA5RS
--
Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
Sent Using: ChurchPup-Linux
http://www.churchpup.com/
Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html
|_|___|_|
| | & | |
{|
/\ {|
/ \ {|
/ \ {|
/ @ \ {|
| |~_|~~~~|
| -| | |
============\ # KD4E
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|