RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] What the Cellphone Industry Doesn't Want You to Know about Rad

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] What the Cellphone Industry Doesn't Want You to Know about Radiation Concerns
From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:00:17 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
My God, that snippet of text is not even good English!  Wow!
-- 
Thanks,
Dave
For Amateur Radio equipment reviews and setups see:
http://www.nk7z.net

A day without thermonuclear fusion is like a day without sunshine.



On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 08:48 -0400, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: 
> The article is shot full of juicy bits like this, as well as outright 
> mistakes.
> 
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
> http://reversebeacon.net,
> blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
> For spots, please go to your favorite
> ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
> 
> On 6/12/2013 4:19 AM, w5gn@mxg.com wrote:
> > ... Henry Lai and Narendra N.P. Singh found significant evidence of DNA 
> > damage caused by cellphone light radiation ...Well, it's true that 
> > non-ionizing radiation lacks the power to have damage. But its damage seems 
> > to come from its modulated signal. So every 900 milliseconds, if you have a 
> > cellphone in your pocket, it's getting half of that radiation which is 
> > getting into you as it seeks the signal from the tower.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>