Thanks for the support here!
--
Support better RFI practices, please sign this petition:
at Whitehouse.gov
http://wh.gov/lpz5Y
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 09:20 -0600, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> I think the people have already spoken on the way this was written with
> the complete lack of support it has received.
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> On 3/28/2014 8:41 AM, David Cole wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > No question it needs work, if it were to get to the stage of actually
> > being considered, it would need lots of work, and it would get that
> > work... More than likely the ARRL would become involved, and that would
> > help a lot.
> >
> > As things sit, right now, the ham is in a very bad position, and I see
> > nothing making it better... This is an effort to make things better.
> > The goal is to get things in front of people in the government. Will
> > the FCC suddenly see the light and start tracking down RFI sources, not
> > a chance. Will things be slightly better if the government is aware
> > that RFI is becoming a major issue for Emergency Communicators, maybe!
> > One way guarantees no action, one way might get some help... I choose
> > the way that may help, not the guaranteed failure that RFI location is
> > now. The FCC does a good job once notified, and once it has a target,
> > it is getting the enforcement target that is broken.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|