RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] LEDs et al

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] LEDs et al
From: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 15:53:43 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 12:22 -0600, Tom Thompson wrote:
> Nice post, Dave,
> 
> I really like your approach and the information you have on your web 
> page.  I think trying to correct the problem without getting the 
> authorities involved initially is definitely the right way to go.
> 
> 73,   Tom   W0IVJ

Thank you Tom, that means a lot coming from you!  I point folks at your
site often, and your work has resulted directly in a lower RFI level for
me personally, and I am sure others, so tahnk you again for your work.

I have had such good results by being kind, and not turning into an
enforcer.  I literally have only had to involve the ARRL, or FCC, once
in the last five years.  Probably something like 20 or 25 RFI issues
solved for myself and other hams over that time frame.

-- 
73's, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
For software/hardware reviews see:
http://www.nk7z.net

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>