RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 21

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 21
From: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:35:18 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
FWIW department; a local Batteries Plus has four kinds of solid state ballasts for sale; two have no FCC markings, one says it's for commercial use only (in VERY small print) and the  one that references Part 18 says "FCC Part 18A".  NO progress since 2014. (http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Committee%20Reports/2014/July/Doc_20b.pdf)

Cortland -- KA5S, semiretired
(Contract work via Belcan LLC)

One problem with the lighting industry is that they, in general, are
unaware of the FCC requirements placed on their segment.  Nearly all the
lighting projects I've done indicate the lighting segment is unaware of any
requirements placed on them by the FCC.  Once made aware, they usually
continue to honor FCC.

Only a strong FCC can do anything about China.  Not complaining.  Just
stating reality.

Dave - WØLEV
EMC Design & Test, LLC

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:19 PM Mike Pansini <kf5yub@gmail.com> wrote:

This light quest; I don't understand why I'm the only person actually doing
something instead of complaining. There's the problem, people complain but
don't actually investigate, instead complain with no resolution. I will
re-iterate, everything electrical causes RFI, even the SUN. HF black outs
caused by solar … SUN.
Just because something is written doesn't mean it's fact or true. Get
involved and ask the right people, stop complaining.
73,
Mike KF5YUB


On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:00 AM <rfi-request@contesting.com> wrote:

Send RFI mailing list submissions to
         rfi@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
         http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
         rfi-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
         rfi-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."


Today's Topics:

    1. Re: RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19 (Dave Cole)
    2. Re: RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19 (David Eckhardt)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:39:02 -0700
From: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
Message-ID: <ee82547a-f40a-0d83-84db-7339035d017d@nk7z.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Mike,
I can't seem to locate any reference to FCC Part 15 at the link
provided, can you point me at the FCC certified info on their web site
please?

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Technical Specialist
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 7/29/19 8:37 AM, Mike Pansini wrote:
Greetings,
To direstly answer the LED growing lights, find a company that is FCC
compliant and has proof of FCC as well as all the safety RoHS etc...
Ask
about their return policy.
   After reading a thread from FCC about LED grow lights, I began to
question
yard and street lights as well. I talked with the FCC regarding the
"grow
LEDs" causing interference. That's a fuzzy situation is about the
answer
I
got. Clearly, I was told, if something is FCC certified, either a
sticker,
pamphlet, other FCC paperwork is required by the FCC to accompany the
product. I think it's a lot of money to certify something and not
display
proof, be ware!!  I tried a couple "FCC certified" LEDs only to find
problems with one manufacture stating "FCC" but no proof of FCC, and
broken
electrical parts, or the product is not in compliant with FCC. They did
cause about a S-5, and S-3 QRN and that's not good for hearing weak
signals.
Look up *MORSEN* *Lighting*,* they are FCC certified*, and supply that
proof in the paperwork supplied with their products. They do cause
slight
QRN but may be an S-1 or less I found. I hope this helps you and your
wife
have fun with your hobbies at the same time. I am growing about 50 Rare
Hungarian Paprika Peppers, some two Habaneros and two Serrano peppers.
I
grow bare root trees (Arbor Day Foundation), getting them ready for
outdoors...Golden Raintrees, Crape Mertyle bushes, Nanking Cherry
bushes
(finally made Nanking Cherry Jelly and syrup), Bodark tree, Passion
fruit,
(enclosed porch) Rubber plants, Ponytail Palm tree.

    https://www.morsenled.com/ <https://www.morsenled.com/>

73,
Mike KF5YUB


On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM <rfi-request@contesting.com> wrote:

Send RFI mailing list submissions to
          rfi@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
          http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
          rfi-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
          rfi-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."


Today's Topics:

     1. LED Grow Lights (Kim Elmore)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:09:50 -0500
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
To: "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] LED Grow Lights
Message-ID: <e76a5508-0cc1-f454-7061-c00bb023b8a2@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

My Wife enjoys starting garden plants form seed indoors and, up until
a
few days ago, used a 175W metal halide lamp for the purpose. It used
and
electronic ballast that, sadly, has bitten the dust. A new ballast is
a
bit over half the cost of a much brighter and efficient LED grow
light.
But I'm concerned about RFI since it almost certainly uses a switching
supply. Does anyone have any direct knowledge of quiet LED grow lights
in the "1000W" category. (I don't know where that term comes from, but
these tend to be rated at ~165 W power usage.)

Kim N5OP


--

Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM,
PP
SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)

/"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in
practice, there is." //??? Attributed to many people; it???s so true
that
it
doesn???t matter who said it./



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


------------------------------

End of RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
************************************

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:26:08 +0000
From: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
To: Mike Pansini <kf5yub@gmail.com>
Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
Message-ID:
         <
CAODdWWEtkjN5U6UjdgGSe23Ci1ZF-dUS07qfmtNWt8qMXhc+cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Just a reminder of practices from China:

Just because the product may carry the proper 'graffiti' on the
regulatory
label (required for all Home and Small Office electronics - FCC Class B),
does not mean any attention has been paid to design, testing and
approvals
for EMC and Safely.   I have tested and rejected many, if not most,
products (mostly from China and even some from the US) that adhere to
this
scenario.  Printing and applying labels is cheap:  "How many labels do
you
need?".  Designing, testing, and approving products for EMC and Safety is
expensive (between $3K TO $30K on up, depending on complexity).  Safety
is
not necessarily required in the US.  However, to justify the CE mark (N O
T  standing for China Export ! ! ! ! ! ! ), both safety and EMC must be
conducted by an approved body.  Most of us know this.  However, because
of
the example set by the Chinese, many legitimate US suppliers are taking a
similar approach weighing cost against risk and reputation.  Most get
away
with the practice.  A very few do not.

*Bottom Line:*  Don't take the presence of the the proper 'graffiti' on
the
regulatory label as gospel. Request the documentation to justify what is
on
the label.  Read the report in total to verify it isn't assembled from
multiple and non-related equipment and reports (another common practice
from China).

Been there.  Done that.  Experienced all of the above (and then some).

Dave - W?LEV
EMC Design & Test, LLC

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:37 PM Mike Pansini <kf5yub@gmail.com> wrote:

Greetings,
To direstly answer the LED growing lights, find a company that is FCC
compliant and has proof of FCC as well as all the safety RoHS etc...
Ask
about their return policy.
  After reading a thread from FCC about LED grow lights, I began to
question
yard and street lights as well. I talked with the FCC regarding the
"grow
LEDs" causing interference. That's a fuzzy situation is about the
answer
I
got. Clearly, I was told, if something is FCC certified, either a
sticker,
pamphlet, other FCC paperwork is required by the FCC to accompany the
product. I think it's a lot of money to certify something and not
display
proof, be ware!!  I tried a couple "FCC certified" LEDs only to find
problems with one manufacture stating "FCC" but no proof of FCC, and
broken
electrical parts, or the product is not in compliant with FCC. They did
cause about a S-5, and S-3 QRN and that's not good for hearing weak
signals.
Look up *MORSEN* *Lighting*,* they are FCC certified*, and supply that
proof in the paperwork supplied with their products. They do cause
slight
QRN but may be an S-1 or less I found. I hope this helps you and your
wife
have fun with your hobbies at the same time. I am growing about 50 Rare
Hungarian Paprika Peppers, some two Habaneros and two Serrano peppers.
I
grow bare root trees (Arbor Day Foundation), getting them ready for
outdoors...Golden Raintrees, Crape Mertyle bushes, Nanking Cherry
bushes
(finally made Nanking Cherry Jelly and syrup), Bodark tree, Passion
fruit,
(enclosed porch) Rubber plants, Ponytail Palm tree.

   https://www.morsenled.com/ <https://www.morsenled.com/>

73,
Mike KF5YUB


On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM <rfi-request@contesting.com> wrote:

Send RFI mailing list submissions to
         rfi@contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
         http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
         rfi-request@contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
         rfi-owner@contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."


Today's Topics:

    1. LED Grow Lights (Kim Elmore)



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:09:50 -0500
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
To: "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] LED Grow Lights
Message-ID: <e76a5508-0cc1-f454-7061-c00bb023b8a2@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

My Wife enjoys starting garden plants form seed indoors and, up
until a
few days ago, used a 175W metal halide lamp for the purpose. It used
and
electronic ballast that, sadly, has bitten the dust. A new ballast
is a
bit over half the cost of a much brighter and efficient LED grow
light.
But I'm concerned about RFI since it almost certainly uses a
switching
supply. Does anyone have any direct knowledge of quiet LED grow
lights
in the "1000W" category. (I don't know where that term comes from,
but
these tend to be rated at ~165 W power usage.)

Kim N5OP


--

Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM,
PP
SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)

/"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
in
practice, there is." //??? Attributed to many people; it???s so true
that
it
doesn???t matter who said it./



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


------------------------------

End of RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
************************************

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


--

*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
*Just Think*


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


------------------------------

End of RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 21
************************************

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>