RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Rfi help

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: [RFI] Rfi help
From: Kimo Chun <kimochun@gmail.com>
Reply-to: kimo@lava.net
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 18:07:07 -1000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I believe I saw, once, a type N-Male connector for RG-214 that had two
separate clamping sections, one for each layer of braid. I'd have to go
look to see if I have it somewhere. I don't recall if it was installed on a
cable or an unused connector.

Kimo Chun, KH7U


Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 17:26:47 -0500
From: "chuck.gooden" <chuck.gooden@comcast.net>
To: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>, Randy Davenport
        <pastor.spaceboy@gmail.com>, jwin95@yahoo.com
Cc: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Rfi help
Message-ID: <mailman.721.1589685136.6838.rfi@contesting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

I beleive the connectors used on Rg214 are different part numbers and are
more difficult to install correctly.Chuck K9LC
-------- Original message --------From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <
kgordon2006@frontier.com> Date: 5/16/20  3:55 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: Randy
Davenport <pastor.spaceboy@gmail.com>, jwin95@yahoo.com Cc:
rfi@contesting.com Subject: Re: [RFI] Rfi help On 16 May 2020 at 19:55,
AA5CT wrote:> Two - shields?> That would be RG-214Correct. I was wrong.>
Two shields each made of silver-plated copper braid.> Inner dielectric
dimension is the same as RG-213 cable> > RG-214 cable good (usable) to 10
GHz per spec sheets. 213 only ~ 1 GHz.> > Not as flexible as RG-213 though
on account of all that braid.> > For normal HF operations (single op)
RG-214 cable would be significant overkill.Absolutely correct...and far
more costly.Ken W7EKB_______________________________________________RFI
mailing listRFI@contesting.comhttp://
lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>