RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Flag Pennant loop - Tiny SA use

To: "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Flag Pennant loop - Tiny SA use
From: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:29:59 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I am using the Flag as brewed by a friends of mine (N0DL and KE0EPY). I am 
using it with a Yaesu FT-818 and the DXE preamp. It has proven to be a great 
asset in my current issue. The DXE preamp is a very easy to use/polished 
product.

I am sure a SpecAn would provide even more revealing results. I am anxious to 
see the results of the effort.

73,
Joe kk0sd

 

-----Original Message-----
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+gary_mayfield=hotmail.com@contesting.com> On Behalf Of 
Dave Cole
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 8:15 PM
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Flag Pennant loop - Tiny SA use

Hi Don,
I may just break down and buy the DXE product!  :)  Thanks for sharing that 
info.

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 4/12/21 6:03 PM, Don Kirk wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> 
> I've gotten a little lost in this thread, but if you intend to use the 
> tinySA with the Portable Flag I would like to comment about the 
> placement of the attenuators relative to a preamp.  I was involved 
> with the initial field testing of the DX Engineering preamp designed 
> for use with my portable flag and the first thing I recognized was 
> that having attenuation before the preamp really destroyed the signal 
> to noise ratio because the signal is so low from the portable flag and 
> attenuating it causes the preamp noise figure to become a more 
> dominate factor that degrades the signal to noise ratio.  The design 
> was then changed so that the attenuators come after the preamp which 
> fixed the problem by keeping the signal from the portable flag going 
> into the preamp as high as possible.  The beauty of the DX Engineering 
> preamp is that it can be turned off if not needed, and the attenuators 
> can be used with the preamp on or off which provides a lot of 
> flexibility to handle all situations, and it also has a selectable high pass 
> filter to block the AM broadcast band as needed.
> 
> Just some things to consider when home brewing your own system if you 
> plan to use it with the portable flag that has very negative gain.
> 
> Just FYI,
> Don (wd8dsb)
> 
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:33 PM Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi LEV Dave and the group,
>>      Indeed your comment most true. I have decided that a preamp 
>> would be the answer for me but to have the attenuator I mentioned in 
>> front of the Preamp. If I have large signals making IMD I certainly 
>> wont need the extra gain and dynamic range so attenuate it. If the 
>> signals are small they will not overload the dynamic range and make 
>> IMD generally and the attenuator can be off. . The attenuator in the 
>> Tiny SA is a menu item a bit unhandy to reach in the field. And not much dB 
>> range.
>>     This way the preamp wont have to be a power hog for high level signals.
>> With the tiny SA at about -100 dBm noise floor I am thinking adding a 
>> 1 to
>> 2 dB noise figure preamp which  will increase the sensitivity without 
>> much added noise over the common 18 to 22 dB you mention. Normally in 
>> a lab analyzer you can adjust the sweep speed as well as the 
>> resolution bandwidth to get a lower noise display. That’s not an 
>> option in the tiny SA. So, I will see how this works.
>>    Any way appreciate the comment as it definitely deserves some thought. .
>> Lee  K7TJR  OR
>> From: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 4:49 PM
>> To: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
>> Cc: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; rfi@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [RFI] Flag Pennant loop - Tiny SA use
>>
>> Don't forget the average 'lab' SA has a typical noise figure around 
>> 18 to
>> 22 dB.  All need a preamp for reasonable sensitivity.  Many of the 
>> lab instruments today are being marketed with a built-in preamp for 
>> this reason.  Also, note the dynamic range is degraded by the gain of 
>> the preamp.  It's generally best to have it present but easily 
>> bypassable for that reason.
>>
>> Dave - WØLEV
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:35 PM Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com<mailto:
>> k7tjr@msn.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Dave and group,
>>     I find the Tiny SA a little low on sensitivity so I am planning 
>> on adding an external 20 dB preamp with an easier to use step 
>> attenuator for RFI hunting.
>> I have some other obligations at the moment so I am temporarily using 
>> an SI 4732 radio which is also a tiny box with AM.
>>   I have the local power company and a wood products manufacturing 
>> company working with me on an interesting conducted interference case 
>> I will eventually report on here later after  more tests.
>> Lee   K7TJR   OR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: RFI <rfi-bounces+k7tjr=msn.com@contesting.com<mailto:
>> msn.com@contesting.com>> On Behalf Of Dave Cole
>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 1:00 PM
>> To: rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RFI] Flag Pennant loop - added benefit of being 
>> broadband
>>
>> BTW:
>>
>> I am currently working on setting up a tinySA on the FLAG...  Try it, 
>> it is really portable.  The tinySA will mount right on the support 
>> pole for the FLAG.  No computer, no SDR, just a box the size of a pack of 
>> smokes...
>>
>> 73, and thanks,
>> Dave (NK7Z)
>> https://www.nk7z.net
>> ARRL Volunteer Examiner
>> ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
>> ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave - WØLEV
>> Just Let Darwin Work
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>