Yes, but CQ-WW-RTTY goes in the CONTEST: field, not in the CAREGORY:
field. Notice that the only options for mode-category in the CATEGORY:
field are CW, SSB or MIXED. The problem is that Writelog was putting
RTTY in the CATEGORY: field. This part of the specification should
probably be changed.
73,
Jim N6VH
Dave W7DPW wrote:
According to the specifications: CQ-WW-RTTY is correct , see the
following:
http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/spec.html
Dave W7DPW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
To: <RTTY@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 6:15 AM
Subject: [RTTY] Correction & Apologies
A statement in one of my earlier posts may have the wrong
perception.
When I stated that I had to remove the word RTTY from the Category
in my
Cabrillo file before the CQ Robot would accept it, I did not mean to
imply that
there was anything wrong with the Robot. There is nothing wrong
with the robot.
There is a standard for Cabrillo files and there should be. The
Robot accepts
Cabrillo files that adhere to that standard.
WriteLog incorrectly puts RTTY in the category field. I have
written Ron and
Wayne and asked that this be corrected.
My apologies to the crew at CQ for any misperception on the robot.
73, Don AA5AU
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|