| To: | <ku8e@bellsouth.net>, <rtty@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM] | 
| From: | "J. Michael Furfari" <Furfari_JM@adelphia.net> | 
| Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:13:26 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> | 
| 
seems like both RTTY and CW have EQUAL privileges to use this portion of the 
band, probably splitting the band (7030-7040 for rtty and 7040 and above for 
CW) would be a better solution than complete abstinence ??? I realize the Sprint requires people to jump frequency after completing a contact and not hold a frequency so the old listen before you leap might not work so well with this contest combination. just my 2 cents. 73 de Mike K3FH ----- Original Message ----- From: <ku8e@bellsouth.net> To: <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:07 AM Subject: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM] 
 
  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], ku8e | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], Don Hill AA5AU | 
| Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], ku8e | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], Don Hill AA5AU | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |