RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan

To: "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com>, "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan
From: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:58:42 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Lack of experimentation? Page 64 of April QST, H4FSK from KN6KB.

Ron
K0IDT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com>
To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Cc: "Terry" <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan



On Mar 16, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Terry wrote:

Perhaps there will be some great RTTY like modes
that come out of the new unregulated experiments.  If something positive is
developed, it can be let out of the experimental sub-band (sandbox) and
allowed into the main stream RTTY sub band.

I am not sure that the old rules has *ever* impeded the development of more 
innovative keyboard-to-keyboard modes.

A good example is DominoEX, which automatically tunes as fast as the best RTTY operator, and has similar latency once you turn FEC off, plus it prints better than RTTY at the same SNR.

IMHO, there has never been a lack of experimentation, even with improving RTTY itself -- what do you think fldigi and 2Tone are, they certainly are not copying how old analog modems did things.



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>