We shouldn't have to move if the ARRL would adopt the Region 2 bandplan.
Don't get fixated on mode, application is more important and if the lower band
ends follow the Region 2 plan the problem is solved. ACDS confined to very
upper ends and wideband digi could use the voice/image segments. As Jay
pointed out it would be an advantage in an Emcomm situation to be able to
transmit voice/image/data on a single frequency. Of course it would mean the
FCC would have to authorize data in the voice/image segment and getting
rid of Part 97.221 to haul in the outlaws.
Ron
K0IDT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry" <ab5k@hotmail.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:23 PM
Subject: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee
I have been under the assumption that we would propose remaining in the
current allocated RTTY sub bands. One suggestion that has came is to move
lower in frequency below .070. That does not help on 40 meters but it's a
option for 80 meters and the higher bands. At this early stage, we do not
want to rule any options out so what are the general thoughts on moving
lower in frequency?
Thanks,
Terry AB5K
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|