RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RM-11708

To: G3YYD <g3yyd@btinternet.com>, 'RTTY Reflector' <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708
From: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 15:00:21 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Thanks David and it's something everyone should consider in comments. Take a look at the Region 2 band plan, with minor tweaking to fit some of the license class rules it's quite workable for US hams. I'm going to suggest just that in a comment along with better enforcement of current rules......no rule/regulation change just enforcement.

Ron K0IDT


On 7/29/2016 11:04 AM, G3YYD wrote:
Bandwidth limits have been used for many years in the IARU Region 1 plan. They are 
voluntary and are complied with by the vast majority of operators (I would say 
>99%).

So the "RTTY" segments are 500Hz bandwidth, "CW" segments are 200Hz and "SSB" 
2700Hz. However some are further qualified by type of use as well.

For a better understanding then look here: 
https://thersgb.org/services/bandplans/html/rsgb_band_plan_june_2016.htm

Seems to be that the land of the free is not the land of the free when it comes 
to amateur radio regulations. They are vastly more onerous and complex than the 
ones here in the UK. For those who want to know more here is the current UK 
licence:
http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/spectrum/amateur-radio/guidance-for-licensees/amateur-terms.pdf

73 David G3YYD



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>