| To: | <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] SK is bad? |
| From: | "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | jbwolf@comcast.net |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2016 21:36:05 -0400 |
| List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
>>> and exactly how do I change that shaping? Up until recently it was purely an analog circuit, usually a modified RC network that determined the slope of the transition. That shaping can now be done digitally; at least it is in some military equipment. I don't know for sure, but I doubt that amateur equipment goes quite that far with it. Jim - KR9U _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] So...2125 or 1275, Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RTTY] NS RTTY this Thursday, Ken K6MR |
| Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] 2016 WAE RTTY NA LP Plaque, Don Hill AA5AU |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] SK is bad?, Peter Laws |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |