>Charles D. Shinn writes:
>I agree. It would appear that virtually all equipment reviews are
>tainted by the inability of the reviewer to express themselves because
of real >or imaginary "Loss of Advertising Revenue". Business is poor
these days.
>Cutting out those advert bux to an unfriendly rag might be a good move
>for some that might be on the edge.....Chuck
I couldn't agree more. Reviews by CQ are not worth the expenditure of
time. I've found QST to be much more thorough in evaluations of
equipment.
Loren W7BWI
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|