[TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews

To:	<tentec@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews
From:	jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:59:26 -1000

> 
> My "weighting scale" is 90% on tests and facts,

I find the ARRL lab "Expanded Test Reports",  which are
ALL data,  to be just great!  Nothing subjective there.

73,  Jim  KH7M

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, (continued) [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Tom Rauch [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, cherry@getnet.net [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, George, W5YR [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use, Dave McClafferty [TenTec] Save the Memories!, Bill Ames [TenTec] Save the Memories!, j [TenTec] Save the Memories!, Carl Moreschi [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, w8au@sssnet.com [TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, Jim Reid <=

Previous by Date:	[TenTec] ARRL reviews, James Duffer
Next by Date:	[TenTec] Performance Measures in QST, Stuart Rohre
Previous by Thread:	[TenTec] Re: ARRL reviews, w8au@sssnet.com
Next by Thread:	[TenTec] FS/Trade : Pegasus Station, NZ8J
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]