Yes, 600hz for CW is correct. At least that is what I have ordered 
for my Plus. George also mentioned in a telephone conversation that 
he had tried building a roofing for the Icom IC-781 but could never 
get that to work correct due to the 781's circuit design. His 600hz 
filter and moving the standard filters as you previously suggested, 
just works terrific in the Orion. 
 
Tom - W4BQF 
 
"So you have enemies?
Good.
That means you have stood up for something,
sometime in your life."
--Sir Winston Churchill--  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu> 
To: <tentec@contesting.com> 
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 7:16 AM 
Subject: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Omni VI Roofing Filters 
 
 
VE7TK wrote: 
>My discussions with George (W2VJN) at InRad suggest that an Omni 
>VI+ with 
the new (soon to be out) InRad roofing filter may be a worthy 
competitor 
when it comes to IMD dynamic range (even stock it's not too 
shabby).  George 
indicated that "the improvement for close in signals is quite 
dramatic and 
places the Omni VI into the group of today's top performing 
radios." 
 
        Very true and I know of at least one person who has been 
using a 
homebrew version of this in an Omni VI for about a year.  The 
modified 
Omni has a similar front-end design to Orion and performance 
should be 
very similar to the Orion with the #762 filter. 
 
>The filter will be available in a 600 Hz and 2400 Hz version. 
>The first 
batch, to those of us who got on the pre-production order, should 
be shipped 
late next week.  Hopefully a modified rig will soon make it to 
Sherwood for 
some independent tests. 
 
        Are you sure about that 600 Hz version?  George's white 
paper below 
says it is a 400 Hz version, which is one reason I feel it could 
do slightly 
better than Orion with Inrad's 600 Hz #762. 
 
http://www.qth.com/inrad/roofing-filters.pdf (page 6) 
 
"Ten Tec Omni VI series: We are presently working on a roofing 
filter mod for 
the Omni VI+ radios. Plans are not quite formalized yet, but some 
preliminary 
data from our lab is shown below. 
Signal Spacing IMD DR Filter Bandwidth 
 
20 kHz  100 dB  2800 Hz
5 kHz           93 dB   2800 Hz  
20 kHz  100 dB  400 Hz
5 kHz           100 dB  400 Hz
1 kHz           90 dB   400 Hz  
We hope to make this unit available in the late fall or winter of 
this year." 
 
        In any event, I suspect two Ten-Tec rigs will be at the 
top of 
Sherwood's list for a long time to come, and it will just be 
interesting 
to see which is #1 and which is #2...they both should be very 
close. 
 
                                        73,  Bill  W4ZV 
_______________________________________________ 
TenTec mailing list 
TenTec@contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
  _______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
  
 |