Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>N7US wrote
> >I understand that the Orion's subreceiver is general coverage and is not
>nearly the receiver that the main receiver is for the ham bands. What's the
>practical significance of the poorer subreceiver?
>
> It has significantly worse IMD and BDR performance
>than the Main RX, but it depends how you use it whether
>that is important or not. I normally use the Sub RX only
>in split operation to listen on my TX frequency (for example
>to find the stations DX is working in a pileup). These
>signals are normally strong enough that IMD is not a big issue.
I use the subrx a large percentage of the time for stereo diversity reception
with a second antenna. On the low bands, I'll feed the subrx with either a 2nd
Beverage antenna or the TX antenna. I do encounter its limitations, which
manifest in hearing either "ghost" images of strong offchannel (many Khz away)
stations or its noise floor modulated by close-in (<2Khz away) strong stations.
Otherwise it performs quite well.
73,
Barry N1EU
__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register
Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|