| To: | "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now? |
| From: | "George" <goofyham@highstream.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:28:59 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Carl; Thank you for making this clear about the ARRL having to charge for the service. I have no problem with paying them for the service and awards. George _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, Carl Moreschi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Whats a good way to monitor your cw signal?, JAMES HANLON |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, Carl Moreschi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, Ron Notarius W3WN |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |