| To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion | 
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Date: | Sun, 6 May 2007 17:29:46 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
> The sub > receiver in > the OII is a sub, not > As capable receiver as the main. The K3 sub receiver should > be called a > co-receiver, since it is identical > To the main one. That is true, but it is still an extra cost option, which was the point, I think. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion V2.060b Comments, Michael W Elliott | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New Orion II firmware, STEVEN KLINE | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion, Mike Short | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion, K4IA | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |