Gee, and I thought I mentioned signal-to-noise ... when I said :
> I guess it's just so quiet, signal-to-noise-wise
that it makes a good receiving antenna, but that
same inefficiency holds it back on transmitting
efficiency. > One of the happier paradoxes of life
Happy Days !
=================== James -K8JHR ========================
On 12/5/2010 7:31 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
> I disagree.
> It depends on how on how you define "efficient".
>
> What matters is signal to noise difference.
>==========================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|