| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Speech Processor |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:21:47 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The original TT product information stated an RF type speech processor is much more effective than an AF-based processor. I cannot say why, myself, but that is what TT said. ======================================= K8JHR =================== On 11/29/2011 12:36 PM, Barry N1EU wrote: > Why wouldn't a properly implemented DSP speech processor be able to > achieve the same level of compression? > __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Autotuner upgrade?, Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Experience with the Eagle in CQWW CW--TS-590S, Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Speech Processor, amsctalx |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Speech Processor, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |