| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution |
| From: | Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:29:50 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
To further amplify Rick's comments, an antenna that has gained
popularity in USA in recent years, is a 40 odd foot high vertical for 80
and 160m work. One of our North TX hams published his versions in two
QST articles.
Rick's long standing use of a vertical half wave antenna for 40m which also loads on the lower band reinforces the utility of the Cebik 90 per cent efficiency observation. Thanks for mentioning that, Rick. -Stuart Rohre K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Richards |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |