| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:09:36 -0700 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Great work, Steve. Thanks for posting it.One hypothesis for the difference in behavior of the two different samples might be the properties of their dielectric. 73, Jim K9YC On 8/8/2013 2:59 PM, Steve Hunt wrote: I managed to find time today to produce a web page on my measurements. For anyone interested:http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/wet_ll/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Joe KX4JR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Argo V amp keying, Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Wade Staggs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Joel Hallas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |