TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops.

from [Floyd Rodgers] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops.
From: Floyd Rodgers <kc5qbc@swbell.net>
Reply-to: kc5qbc@swbell.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:17:26 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Simple question: How much does it cost to do the job the second time if the first set of parts is defective? 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., geoffrey mendelson
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., Mike Bryce
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Omni C + new Ham = Oops., K7TXO
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Failure Modes for 811a tubes?, Steve Berg
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]