| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs |
| From: | Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:09:08 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The guys in the contest group I sometimes operate with prefer the Omni
VII to the Omni VII - they can use either, but the Omni VI now only gets
worked on multi multi contests.
So... I guess at least some seasoned contest mavens prefer the Omni VII. ------------------ K8JHR ------------------------- On 2/26/2014 12:37 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote: The Omni VI with the INRAD roofing filter is about 15 dB better than the OM7 or 7800. Really no comparison. ----------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with Ten Tecrigs, Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs, Richards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs, bob barnes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |